Legal Opinion

Bedford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 2, 2008No. 4D07-1405PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

970 So.2d 935 (2008)

Mark BEDFORD, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-1405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 2, 2008.

Mark Bedford, South Bay, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Hyndman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

2Per curiam

We grant the motion for clarification, withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following in its place.

The appellant, Mark Bedford, seeks review of the summary denial of a rule 3.850 motion. The lower court denied relief believing the particular issue…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  5. Koon v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haliburton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Pittman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Pittman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API