Haliburton v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Freddie Lee Haliburton appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and 3.850 motions. The motions raised variants of the same claim, and the trial court denied them in a single order ruling that the claim was impermissibly successive. We affirm. The claim is barred by the law of the case and collateral estoppel doctrines and no manifest injustice results. See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 291-92 (Fla.2003).
The issue Haliburton raises was preserved and argued on direct appeal and was rejected on the merits. Haliburton v. State, 861 So.2d 1165…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Sanford v. RubinSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Gudinas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Sochor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hughes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Abbate v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- HOSWELL v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Erlsten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.