Legal Opinion

Turkenitz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered January 6, 1994, which denied plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs lack of fluency in English and ignorance of the law are not acceptable excuses for failing to serve a timely notice of claim (Matter of Perez v New York City Hous. Auth., 156 AD2d 177), and the excuse that she was incapacitated by the injuries she sustained in the accident is insufficient in the absence of any supporting medical evidence (Matter of Rios v City of New York, 180 AD2d 801).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rios v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Perez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bibum v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  2. Gaudio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Gomez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Lefkowitz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Matter of Kim v. Dormitory Authority of the State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API