Legal Opinion

State v. Wellman, 2006 Ca 42 (12-21-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2007No. 2006 CA 42PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, James Lee Wellman, appeals a judgment of the Miami County Common Pleas Court finding him guilty of rape and sentencing him to five years of imprisonment. In his pro se brief, Wellman asserts that his speedy trial rights were violated, that his counsel was ineffective, and that his Constitutional rights were violated by the failure to serve his second indictment. In anAnders brief, Wellman's appellate counsel asserted that the trial court may have erred in sentencing Wellman to more than the minimum sentence. We determine that Wellman's case was terminated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. KapperOhio Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MidlamOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. Vanover, 2007 Ca 30 (9-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. Logsdon, 07-Ca-50 (3-28-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API