Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Fortney

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 29, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01949Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 BRADLEY M. CUNNINGHAM, 9 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01949-BHS-BAT 10 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL 11 ADAM FORTNEY, et al., 12 Defendant. 13 THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion. Pro se plaintiff Bradley M. 14 Cunningham filed this

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action on December 15, 2023. He did not pay the 15 required filing fee and he did not apply to proceed in forma pauperis. He has since conceded he 16 is not indigent, Dkt. 10, and has failed to pay the filing fee despite being ordered to do so. Dkts. 17 22,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API