Cunningham v. Fortney
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 BRADLEY M. CUNNINGHAM, 9 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01949-BHS-BAT 10 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL 11 ADAM FORTNEY, et al., 12 Defendant. 13 THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion. Pro se plaintiff Bradley M. 14 Cunningham filed this
42 U.S.C. § 1983
action on December 15, 2023. He did not pay the 15 required filing fee and he did not apply to proceed in forma pauperis. He has since conceded he 16 is not indigent, Dkt. 10, and has failed to pay the filing fee despite being ordered to do so. Dkts. 17 22,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.