Legal Opinion

Louis H. Rombach and Ann M. Rombach v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 19, 1971No. 72-68PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This ease was referred to Trial Commissioner David Schwartz with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Rule 134(h). The commissioner has done so in an opin ion and report filed on July 20, 1970. Exceptions to the commissioner’s opinion, findings of fact and recommended conclusion of law were filed by plaintiffs. Defendant requested the court to adopt the commissioner’s findings of fact and recommended conclusion of law. The case has been submitted to the court on the briefs of the parties and oral argument of…

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Weiszmann v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  2. Hill v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  3. Weiler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  4. Coughlin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  5. Booth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montgomery Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. Bordo Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Speck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Kandell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API