Blanding v. City of Las Vegas
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*69OPINION
By the Court, (after stating the facts as above) :
Ducker, C. J.
The ruling of the lower court was proper. The complaint does not show that appellants will suffer any injury special to themselves or different in kind from that which will be sustained by the general public. A showing that an injury of this kind will be sustained is essential to enable a person to maintain an action of this character. Symons et al. v. City and County of San Francisco et al., 115 Cal. 555, 42 P. 913, 47 P. 453; Whitsett v. Union D. & R. Co., 10 Colo. 243, 15 P. 339; Hammond v. County Commissioners, 154…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Heller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Dantzer v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Wagner v. SummersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.