Legal Opinion

Blanding v. City of Las Vegas

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1929No. 2833Published

1Opinion of the Court

*69OPINION

By the Court, (after stating the facts as above) :

Ducker, C. J.

The ruling of the lower court was proper. The complaint does not show that appellants will suffer any injury special to themselves or different in kind from that which will be sustained by the general public. A showing that an injury of this kind will be sustained is essential to enable a person to maintain an action of this character. Symons et al. v. City and County of San Francisco et al., 115 Cal. 555, 42 P. 913, 47 P. 453; Whitsett v. Union D. & R. Co., 10 Colo. 243, 15 P. 339; Hammond v. County Commissioners, 154…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Heller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Dantzer v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State ex rel. Wagner v. SummersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API