Legal Opinion

Miller v. Dillard's, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 15, 2001No. 98-4079-SACPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, Senior District Judge.

This diversity jurisdiction case comes before the court on defendant Dillard’s Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. The sole claim brought by the two plaintiffs, Stacey Ann Miller and Brently Ian Dorsey, is a state law tort claim for negligent supervision. Plaintiffs claim arises from their detention, inquiry and search as purported shoplifting suspects by a person plaintiffs believe was employed by Dillard’s.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

A court grants a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure if a genuine…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Surpas Resource Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  2. Wagner v. SFX Motor Sports, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API