Legal Opinion
Browdy v. State-Wide Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1968PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
This is a motion by the defendant ‘ ‘ for an Order dismissing the Second, Third and Sixth canses of action alleged in the Complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) on the grounds that said alleged Second, Third and Sixth causes of action in the Complaint fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action”.
The infant plaintiff in this case was injured by a vehicle owned and operated by defendant’s assured and thereafter recovered a judgment on his cause of action for personal injuries. His father, the other plaintiff in this case, also recovered a judgment for his loss of services.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Elmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Rutter v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bean v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Cassidy v. Millers Cas. Ins. Co. of TexasDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Yelm v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.