Field v. Columbet
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FIELD, Circuit Justice.
Two positions are taken to defeat a recovery by the plaintiff: First. That the premises are embraced in the deed of December, 1854, to Ann Columbet, and in the deed of January, 1859, to the defendant, Second. That if the title remained in Higuera, his deed of July, 1860, was inoperative to pass it the grantee not being at the time in possession of the premises.
The first position depends upon the- construction to be given to the description of the premises in the deeds of 1854 and 1859. The description is identical in both deeds. It gives the boundary as commencing at a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jackson ex dem. Salisbury v. FishNew York Supreme Court · 1813
- Sullivan v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
- Lynch v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by12 opinions
- DeWitt v. BalbenWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Olson v. CornwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Whalon v. North Platte Canal & Colonization Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1903
- Evenson v. WebsterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Hershey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.