Legal Opinion

United States v. Cesaitis

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 22, 1981No. Crim. 80-80337PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CORRECT PRESENTENCE REPORT

COHN, District Judge.

I

Before the Court is a motion by defendant to correct his presentence report on the grounds that inclusion in the report of convictions where defendant was not represented by counsel and of arrests that did not result in prosecution or conviction, violate defendant’s right to due process of law.

For the reasons hereafter stated, defendant’s motion is denied, but with defendant given leave to submit supplementary material for inclusion in the report.

II

A

On June 3,1980 defendant pleaded guilty to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richard S. Berry v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Thomas v. FoltzDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  3. Benedict v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API