Legal Opinion

Benedict v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 21, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-73746PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COHN, District Judge.

Before the Court is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the September 25, 1981 decision of Respondent, the United States Parole Commission, denying Petitioner release on parole. Petitioner contends that he is entitled to habeas relief because: (1) Respondent’s application of then recently revised parole decision-making guidelines, 28 C.F.R. § 2.20 (1981), to his parole application violated the ex post facto clause of the Constitution, and (2) Respondent improperly determined his “salient factor…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. FORMAN v. McCALLCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. DiNapoli v. Northeast Regional Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Wilson v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  4. Antonio Pino Palafox v. Calvin EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Cain v. WinnDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API