Legal Opinion

United States v. Warnell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1933No. 7031PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

This suit was instituted February 6, 1932, against Warnell and his sureties on a release bond to recover $1,000, the full penalty of the bond. Warnell was served by publication; the sureties personally. They appeared defending on the ground that on October 13, the day the cause was set for trial, the sureties had directed Warnell, who had the car in his possession, to deliver it into the custody of the Administrator as required by the bond, and that subsequently he had told them that he did so deliver it. That on October 21st the Administrator had possession of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. United States v. ZerbeySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. FiedlerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
  5. United States v. FiedlerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. BainsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  2. United States v. C. I. T. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API