Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 24, 2017No. 110346Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 110,346 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. TIOFILO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Charging documents do not bestow or confer subject matter jurisdiction on state courts to adjudicate criminal cases; the Kansas Constitution does. 2. Charging documents need only show that a case has been filed in the correct court, e.g., the district court rather than municipal court; show that the court has territorial jurisdiction over the crime alleged; and allege facts that, if proved beyond a reasonable doubt, would constitute a Kansas crime…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. DickeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API