Legal Opinion

Felder v. Neeves

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1926No. 17230PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. An action for the purchase-price of goods can not be altogether defeated by a plea of total failure of consideration, unless the evidence shows that they were totally worthless for any purpose. Hardee v. Carter, 94 Ga. 482 (19 S. E. 715); Stimpson Specialty Co. v. Parker, 10 Ga. App. 295 (1) (73 S. E. 412); Clegg-Ray Co. v. Indiana Scale Co., 125 Ga. 558 (54 S. E. 538). Where, as in the instant case, the evidence clearly shows that the machine which was the subject-matter of the contract could have been repaired at a reasonable cost, and when so repaired would have performed the service…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clegg-Ray Co v. Indiana Scale & Truck Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Stimpson Specialty Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Hardee v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Barber & Sons v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Trippe v. McLainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colt Co. v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Evans v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Fallen v. Electric Appliance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Hillhouse v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Branch v. Columbia Scale Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API