Legal Opinion

Leibold v. Grosenbaugh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1923No. 17830PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

— The plaintiffs brought this action, claiming the recovery of money which they had previously paid the defendant, which it is alleged was induced by fraudulent representations. The defendant responded to the complaint by denials and a cross-complaint in which she claimed a balance due for services rendered the plaintiffs as their’ attorney. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $413.06. Motion; for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial was duly made. The court denied the motion…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hahn v. BrickellWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Bjorklund v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Clark v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Davis v. Associated Fruit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Des Moines Auto Co. v. TracyWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API