Legal Opinion

Kinsel v. Wieland

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1906No. 5189; No. 2796 C. APublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the District Court of Otero County. Hon. N. Walter Dixon, Judge. Action by J. J. Kinsel against J. B. Wieland. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff brings error. •

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Action by plaintiff Kinsel, payee of a promissory note, against defendant Wieland, as co-maker, he having, as it is alleged, indorsed the same in blank before delivery. The noté was executed in 1897, and signed by John A. Jackson as maker, payable to the order of plaintiff Kinsel.

*298To the complaint stating the foregoing facts, there was an answer containing two defenses: First, a denial that defendant indorsed the note before maturity, but, on the contrary, the same was indorsed by defendant after its execution and delivery and on the day of its maturity, and at the solicitation of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Dunn v. GhostSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  3. Fisk v. ReserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  4. Martin v. ColeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1876
  5. Tabor v. MilesColorado Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colorado Midland Railway Co. v. EdwardsColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Lockard v. LockardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Colorado Midland Railway Co. v. EdwardsColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API