Legal Opinion

People v. Huber

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1964No. Crim. 91PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

The defendant, Clark B. Huber, Jr., waived a jury and after trial was found guilty by the court of burglary in the second degree; the information charges that on or about April 18, 1963, the defendant did wilfully enter the building housing a bar known as “The Louvre” at 113 South Washington Street, in the City of Sonora with the intent to commit theft. An experienced member of the Tuolumne County bar represented the defendant by appointment at the trial. After conviction, the court considered the probation report, denied appellant’s application for probation, and sentenced him to state’s…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Ashcraft v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Edwards v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API