Phillips v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was indicted and convicted for robbery in the first degree. Sentence was twenty-one years' imprisonment.
I
The defendant argues that the pretrial identification procedure was unduly suggestive and unreliable and, therefore, inadmissible at trial. After the defendant had been arrested for the robbery of Coggins Jewelry, William T. Coggins, the owner and operator of the store, identified the defendant's photograph from a police "mug book" as one of the men who had robbed him. The mug book contained thirty to forty pictures. The test for determining the reliability of identification…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cumbo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Jennings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.