Legal Opinion

Coleman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 28, 1986PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Floyd Coleman, appellant, was indicted for the offense of robbery when the victim is intentionally killed. Ala. Code § 13-11-2 (a)(2) (1975).1 He was duly arraigned and pleaded not guilty. A jury found him guilty as charged in the indictment. After conclusion of the guilt-finding phase of the trial, appellant, with advice of counsel, and the prosecuting attorney acting for the State, waived argument and the taking of testimony at the sentencing hearing before the jury and stipulated that the case be submitted to the jury for fixing its recommendation as to punishment after proper instructions…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Travis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Ex Parte WindsorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Windsor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API