Legal Opinion

Prosser v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 2008No. ED 89931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NANNETTE A. BAKER, Judge.

Introduction

Timothy Prosser (“Movant”) appeals pro se from a judgment in the St. Genevieve County Circuit Court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief. Because Movant’s appellate brief fails to comply with the appellate briefing requirements as provided by Rule 84.04, we are unable to review his appeal. Appeal dismissed.

Factual and Procedural Background

A jury found Movant guilty of first degree drug trafficking, possession of a chemical, pseudoephedrine, with intent to manufacture a controlled substance and possession of paraphernalia with intent to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Gray v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Gant v. Lou Fusz Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. McGill v. Boeing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. ProsserMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First State Bank of St. Charles v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. BellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Kieffer v. GIANINOMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. MashekMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Carter v. Treasurer of the StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API