Legal Opinion
Richland Irrigation District v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1955No. 13542_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
We have for consideration two appeals consolidated for hearing. The cases in which the appeals are taken were numbered 128-98 and 128-100 in the trial court.
The United States of America, in order to provide space for the Hanford atomic project situate in the state of Washington, instituted condemnation proceedings involving some 204,000 acres of land. Property in private ownership as well as properties of appellant Rich-land Irrigation District were taken. District properties are involved in the cases now before us. Two declarations of taking were filed. The declaration in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. 5139.5 Acres of Land, in Aiken and Barnwell Counties, S. C., Tract No. D-308Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Sunset Cemetery Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- United States v. Priest Rapids Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Zainey v. LindeWashington Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fairfield Gardens, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Dermody v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. 79.95 Acres of Land, More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Henderson v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Institutional Drug Distributors, Inc. v. YankwichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.