Legal Opinion

Ripple v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1980No. 147 and 368PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Corporation, the tenant, appeals the lower court’s order that certain leases for a term in excess of three years violated the statute of frauds and therefore were deemed to be leases from year to year. We affirm.

Appellees, Grace C. Ripple and Doris M. Mcllvane, co-executrixes of the Estate of Freda C. Becker, filed a petition seeking declaratory relief. They asked the court to determine their rights under certain leases executed by the husband of their predecessor in title. Since the facts were undisputed, the case was submitted to the lower…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. O'Malley v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Kennedy v. ERKMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Schweitzer v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Mott v. KaldesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Allegany Gas Co. v. KempSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Target Sportswear, Inc. v. Clearfield FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Tri State Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Herb v. CitiMortgage, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Persing v. Marting, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1984
  5. Target Sportswear, Inc. v. Clearfield FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API