Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Reaney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OR NICOELET COÜHTY Points and authorities of Plaintiffs in Error: First. — Interest is recoverable and should be allowed on an account for goods sold and delivered after tbe same has become payable according to agreement.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OR NICOELET COÜHTY Points and authorities of Plaintiffs in Error: First. — Interest is recoverable and should be allowed on an account for goods sold and delivered after tbe same has become payable according to agreement. Moore vs. Patten, 2 Porter, 451; Dodge vs. Perkins, 9 Pick. 112; State Bank vs. Clarke, 4 Pike, 210; Waning vs. Henry, 30 Alabama, 721; Shields vs. Henry, 31 Alabma, 53. Second. — Interest is always allowed by way of damages, on all claims for money due after demand made, and refusal to pay. Tbe complaint in this case alleges demand and refusal,…

1Opinion of the CourtFlandrau, J.

By the Court. This action was brought to recover for certain goods, wares and merchandize, of the value of $93 05, sold and delivered by Plaintiffs to the Defendant at Pittsburgh, in the State of Pennsylvania, on or about the 15th day of May, 1856, and the demand is for judgment for that amount and interest from the time of the sale and delivery. An answer was put in that raised no material issue. When the action was brought on for trial, the Defendant moved to dismiss it, because the complaint did not disclose a claim for a sum exceeding one hundred dollars, claiming- that, as the demand…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Talcott v. MarstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bierhaus v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. National German American Bank v. LangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. In Re Wisconsin Cent. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1945
  4. In re Wisconsin Cent. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
  5. United States v. Curtis. Curtis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API