Legal Opinion
In re Wisconsin Cent. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 18, 1946No. 17104PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
■ All the parties who have filed briefs and participated in the oral argument recognize that the Trustees of the debtor have the right to use the income to operate the debtor railroad and that their claims are subsequent to that right. Consequently, question (b) becomes moot at this time and need not be discussed. The determination of the question propounded under (a) requires an understanding of a rather detailed recital of facts.
The debtor was placed in receivership on December 3, 1932, by virtue of a complaint filed by the Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Thomas v. Western Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Myer v. Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Cross v. Will County National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- In Re WakeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- In re Wisconsin Cent. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
- In the Matter of Yale Express System, Inc., Debter. Fruehauf Corporation v. Yale Express SystemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- In the Matter of Yale Express System, Inc., Debter. Fruehauf Corporation v. Yale Express SystemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966