Legal Opinion

Burgett v. Flaherty

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1983No. 82-456PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morrison

The First Judicial District Court entered summary judgment in favor of Patrick Flaherty in a legal malpractice action brought by Lyle Burgett. Burgett appeals.

Burgett contends the District Court erred in concluding his claim for relief was barred by the statute of limitations and the doctrine of collateral estoppel.

The collateral estoppel issue need not be reached as the factual allegation to which it applied, malpractice based on entry of an “illegal” dissolution decree, is properly barred by Section 27-2-206, MCA. However, because the record reveals a triable issue of fact as to when…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Reaves v. ReinboldMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. McGee v. WeinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Interstate Manufacturing Co. v. Interstate Products Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Morris v. GeerColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Peschel v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Schneider v. LeaphartMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Montana Pole & Treating Plant v. IF Laucks and Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API