Ford Motor Co. v. Jackson

I concur with Justice Coleman insofar as she holds that the Ingham Circuit Judge did not err in refusing on the record before him to grant claimants’ motion based on GCR 1963, 116.1(4).

For the reasons stated in my opinion in General Motors Corp v Erves (On Rehearing), 399 Mich 241; 249 NW2d 41 (1976), I conclude that:

"for the purposes of § 27(c)(2)(ii) [of the Employment Security Act1], an employee’s layoff begins when he first becomes 'unemployed’ within the meaning of § 482 with respect to his initial employer and continues until the employee is no longer 'unemployed’ with respect to such…