Legal Opinion

United States Steel Products Co. v. Noble

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 7, 1925No. 110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

While Noble, the third engineer on defendant’s steamship, was on watch, the glass on the water gauge on the center of the steamer’s three boilers blew out — a not unusual occurrence — to remedy which a supply of extra glasses was kept on hand. After shutting off the valves or cocks on the gauge to stop the escape of steam from the opening, Noble obtained and insert*90ed a new glass.' Then, in opening the valves to let steam and water into the glass, he tapped the upper and lower arms of the valves, necessarily with a hammer handle, in order to do this evenly and to equalize…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stokes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Thurston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Parker v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1956
  4. Rouchleau v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Stokes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API