Parker v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
PARKINSON, District Judge.
This is an action in damages. The court directed a verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case and the plaintiff has filed a motion for a new trial grounded upon the sole assignment that the court erred in so doing. It is the question raised by the motion which now solicits the decision of this court.
The sole basis upon which the plaintiff seeks to recover — not only as declared upon in his complaint but as announced also in open court — is that the defendant failed to furnish him a reasonably safe place to work because empty cartons were on the floor in the aisle and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wetherbee v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Wetherbee v. Elgin, J. & E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Cabson v. Miami Coal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1923
- United States Steel Products Co. v. NobleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- DeMichaeli & Associates v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Gerald F. Kendrick, Sr. v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- City of Alexandria v. AllenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- DeMichaeli & Associates v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Pavach v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.