Legal Opinion

Keim v. Vette

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 11, 1902PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.- — Hon. H. D. Wood, Judge. (1) The affidavit attached to the petition in this case is not in accordance with the statute nor the rules of pleading applicable to such eases.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.- — Hon. H. D. Wood, Judge. (1) The affidavit attached to the petition in this case is not in accordance with the statute nor the rules of pleading applicable to such eases. Sec. 4463, R. S. 1899; Pattison’s Forms for Missouri Pleading, sec. 458. (2) The respondent, Philip Keim, having placed the” Stewart note for $7,000 in the hands of Charles Kuhn, clothed him with the evidence of ownership thereof, and he is estopped from claiming the same from Vette, who had no notice at the time he acquired the note that Keim had any interest in it. Lee v. Turner,…

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

The facts over which this litigation arose are few and simple.

Philip Keim, a citizen of St. Louis, a butcher by trade, in December, 1895, bought for full value before maturity one principal negotiable promissory note for $Y,000 and ten interest notes for $210 each, all executed by the J. W. Stewart Eeal Estate Company, bearing date October 11, 1895, and payable to the order of Charles Kuhn, and by him indorsed in blank, and received the same into his possession from Kuhn.

These notes were secured by a first lien on three brick houses in the city, and were worth their face and interest.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. MarksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Henry v. SneedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  3. Mayes v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. Johnson v. McMurrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. Sprague v. RooneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kuehn v. KuehnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Baade v. CramerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Davis v. TandyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Julian v. BurrusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Salitan v. Carter, Ealey and DinwiddieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API