May v. Buckhannon River Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtYellott, J.
On the 6th of September, 1888, certain property, belonging to James A. Fritter, was taken by the sheriff under an attachment on original process issued to enforce a claim of Shryock & Co., against the said Fritter. Before this writ was issued the Buckhannon River Lumber Company, on the 29th of August, 1888, had causéd a writ of attachment to be issued against the said Fritter. In the case of Shryock & Co. the sheriff had levied on a horse, buggy, and harness belonging to Fritter, while the Buckhannon River Lumber Company had instructed the sheriff to ievy on other property belonging to said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- PRATT & OTHERS v. Law & CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Horwitz v. EllingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Morehead v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
3Cited by6 opinions
- Deibert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Butler v. TilghmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- M. Schwartz & Sons v. WilmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Smith v. PackardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Radio Communications, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.