Legal Opinion

People v. James

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2008PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Because there was no reasonable view of the evidence to sup port a conviction of the lesser included offense of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05), Supreme Court did not err in declining to submit that charge to the jury.

Defendant and three companions—Davis, Scott and Flores— approached the victim as he left his high school in Manhattan. After briefly conversing with him, Scott and Flores crossed the street to act as lookouts, while defendant and Davis closely surrounded and backed him against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. ScarboroughNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. Van NorstrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. FaulkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. People v. CarlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. People v. GraysonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API