Legal Opinion

People v. Van Norstrand

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1995PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

The issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error by denying defendant’s request to *133charge third degree assault as a lesser included offense of first degree assault.

On the night of March 20, 1991, defendant called for emergency assistance on behalf of his four-month-old son. When the emergency medical technician arrived, defendant advised him that the infant fell off a bed and hit his head on a safe. The technician observed that the child was unresponsive and bruised, and transported him to the emergency room of the local…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. MussendenNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. People v. ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. CabassaNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. Van NorstrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. People v. FinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. BarneyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. People v. BarringerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. LuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API