Legal Opinion

Tipmont Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Fischer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1999No. 61S05-9909-CV-482PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

When the defendant in a civil jury trial seeks to appeal on grounds that the jury’s verdict exceeded the scope of the evidence, must it first have filed a motion to correct error under Ind.Trial Rule 59? We hold that it need not do so.

Appellees Greg and Susan Fischer sued Tipmont Rural Electric Membership Corporation for damage done to their dairy herd by stray voltage. The jury awarded nearly $1.7 million.

On appeal, Tipmont asserted among other things that the verdict exceeded even the evidence most favorable to the Fischers. The Court of Appeals held that this claim…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dahlin v. Amoco Oil Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Borowski v. RupertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Tipmont Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. FischerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Epperly v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Henri v. CurtoIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Estate of Taylor Ex Rel. Taylor v. Muncie Medical Investors, L.P.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Crossmann Communities, Inc. v. DeanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API