Legal Opinion
Mohr v. Midas Realty Corp.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 23, 1988No. 87-1056PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
The narrow question posed by this appeal is whether the law of nuisance is broad enough to comprehend a claim of intentional interference with a view over private property. The property in question consists of two adjoining lots located on a commercial “strip” along Highway 20 in Fort Dodge, Iowa. Plaintiffs Erick and Miriam Mohr own an office building situated on the easternmost lot, with parking in front for tenants and customers. 1 In 1983, Mohr’s neighbors to the west, defendants Midas Realty Corporation and Stan and Lynn Building Partnership, built a muffler shop on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. MilneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Ryan v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Morrison v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Sher v. LeidermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Shriver v. City of OkobojiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- 8,960 Square Feet, More or Less v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Collinson v. John L. Scott, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- 44 Plaza, Inc. v. Gray-Pac Land Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.