Legal Opinion

Hays v. Farwell

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1896No. 130PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Sedgwick district court; C. Reed, judge. Action by John Y. Farwell and others against W. W. Hays for an alleged conversion of goods. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings the'case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion .of the court was delivered by

Cole, J. :

In February, 1888, W. J. Wilson & Co. ■executed certain notes and chattel mortgages upon a *388stock of merchandise situated in the city of Wichita, Kan., to John V. Farweil & Co. and L. D. Skinner, cashier of the State National Bank of Wichita. It was agreed that the chattel mortgages should be concurrent liens and the proceeds of the sale should be divided pro rata between the mortgagees in proportion to their respective debts. The mortgagees took possession of the stock, and while -the same was in their possession, and before the amounts of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. DodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. State v. WilgusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GravesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Dunham v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API