Metropolitan Device Corp. v. Williamsburg Electric Supply Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This suit is' upon four patents, all owned by the appellee, and all used in meter service entrance switch boxes sold by it. There are several other patented features of the appellee’s commercial box, with which we are not here concerned. The appellant makes a switch box which is claimed to infringe the four patents in suit. The known type of installation before the ap-pellee’s was a bloek carrying the required fuses and cut-out devices, mounted on a wall or similar support, and covered by a box with its lower end open and the meter casing set close up against the end of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Brennan & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Ohio Rake Co. v. Bucher & Gibbs Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ruth v. Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1935
- Anderson & Writer Corp. v. Hanky Beret, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1929
- W. N. Matthews Corp. v. Alliance Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Anderson & Writer Corp. v. Hanky Beret, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- (SS) Caglia v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.