Lichentag v. Feitel

The present appellants were appellees in suit No. 322!, recently decided, and that decision exhausted our ap-pelate jurisdiction in the premises.

No review cafl now he had of a judgment, which could have been had on the first appeal, either by motion to amend or be becoming appellants.

Arts. 888-889 C. P.

42 An. 441, 48 A. 351, 105 La. 309.

The first decision concludes both appellants and appellees,

Tire motion to dismiss must prevail.