Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Heintz v. Judges of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1901No. 13,837PublishedCited by 5 opinions

p PPLICATION for Writs of Mandamus and Oertioran.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Blanchard, J.

Relatrix invokes the writ of mandamus to compel the respondent judges to entertain jurisdiction of an appeal which she has taken to their court in the cause entitled Emmet T. Moody et at. vs. Zachariah Strain et als.

The writ of certiorari is asked in aid of the application for mandamus —to bring up the record of the original suit, to the end that the court may be in possession of the necessary information to pass intelligently upon the questions presented.

The record has been brought up.

*310It appears that Emmet T. Moody and Louis J. ITeintz,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vincent v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strain's Heirs v. LyonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Corbett v. HansonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. Corbett v. HansonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  4. Lichentag v. FeitelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1904
  5. Ticker v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API