Legal Opinion

Colonial Mutual Fire Insurance v. Ellinger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 25, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,175PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action of assumpsit upon insurance policy. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. George W. Patton, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ball

First. Appellant argues that the verdict is contrary to the evidence; that the evidence shows appellee had set fire to his own premises, even though the same degree-of proof is required to establish a defense involving crime as is required in a criminal case. Germania v. Klewer, 129 Ill. 612; McConnell v. Delaware Ins. Co., 18 Ill. 328.

There are in this record many circumstances of suspicion. But whether or not this defense was established, was a question of fact which was submitted to the jury, who heard and saw the witnesses and observed their demeanor while on the stand, and then decided…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Protection Life Insurance v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Waterman v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Forsyth v. WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Pugh v. ReatIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Roan v. RohrerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boise Ass'n of Credit Men, Ltd. v. United States Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Price v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  3. United States v. SenecalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929
  4. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Whelan v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API