Legal Opinion
United States v. Senecal
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 4, 1929No. 9056PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
In this case the defendant has been indicted for the illegal possession of intoxicating liquor. He has filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained by Federal prohibition agents upon a search warrant which the defendant claims is void because not executed and returned within the time prescribed by law. Murby v. United States (C. C. A.) 2 F.(2d) 56.
The warrant was dated July 27,1929, and was served and returned on August 6, 1929. The validity of the search warrant, therefore, turns entirely upon whether the day of the date when the warrant was issued shall be included…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sheets v. Selden's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Arnold and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Aultman Taylor Co. v. . SymeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Dutcher v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bemis v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CromerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- United States v. La MonteDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- People v. ClaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993