Legal Opinion

Landis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1918No. 4863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of embezzlement of more than $50 and his punishment assessed at the lowest fixed by law.

The indictment alleged that on or about May 30, 1916 appellant was the agent, clerk, manager and attorney in fact of the incorporated company Wise Hearne Shoe Company and as such he did then and there unlawfully and fraudulently embezzle and fraudulently misapply and convert to his own use without the consent of said company $72.30 which was the corporeal personal property of and belonging to said company and which money had theretofore come into his possession…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Fleener v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  3. Zweig v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Hamer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kugle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. McCue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API