Hamer v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
McCORD, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for embezzlement with a penalty of four years confinement in the penitentiary.
1. Appellant seeks a reversal, first, upon the ground that the bill of indictment is insufficient in that it omits to state the value of the money embezzled; second, that the facts disclosed the relation of debtor and creditor between appellant and the prosecuting witness, and that the court erred in not charging the jury that if the money was loaned to the defendant by the prosecutrix, and the relation of debtor and creditor existed, he could not be guilty of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Parnell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Talamantez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Fellers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.