Providence Health & Services—Washington v. Department of Health
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
¶1 — UWMC applied for a certificate of need to add 79 acute care beds to its Seattle facility. The traditional numeric methodology did not demonstrate need. However, the Department’s certificate of need program approved the application. The HLJ upheld this approval, reasoning that an alternative methodology, “Criterion 2,” showed a need for additional beds. This appeal challenges the review officer’s subsequent decision that it was proper to utilize Criterion 2 and that it was properly applied. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 The State Health Planning and Resources Development Act, chapter 70.38 RCW,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Overlake Hospital Ass'n v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Overlake Hosp. Ass'n v. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- University of Washington Medical Center v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- University of Wash. Med. Ctr. v. Dept. of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- DaVita, Inc. v. Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Headworks Handcrafted Ales, Wa State Liquor & CannabisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- Providence Health & Servs.-Wash. v. Dep't of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Rhett Greenfield, V. Department Of Labor And IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023