Legal Opinion
Godesky v. First Unum Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant First Unum Insurance Company is obligated to provide benefits to the plaintiff pursuant to three disability and business overhead expense insurance policies, the defendant First Unum Life Insurance Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beis*548ner, J.), entered June 12, 1996, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint insofar as asserted against it and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff is entitled…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Niccoli v. Monarch Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paul Shapiro, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Paull v. First UNUM Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Blum v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Korn v. First UNUM Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000