Cox v. Miller
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TITUS, Judge.
Prompted by defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court opined plaintiff had not maintained a careful and vigilant lookout and was, therefore, guilty of negligence as a matter of law which contributed to cause the two-car-intersectional accident in question. Judgment was entered accordingly and plaintiff has appealed contending the question of his negligence vel non should have been submitted to the jury for decision.
North-south Main Street in Joplin consists of four traffic lanes (each 12 feet wide) and two curb-adjacent parking…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dill v. Poindexter Tile CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Shelton v. BrunerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Zumault v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Anderson v. DyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Johnson v. BushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holtmeyer v. SchererMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Holloway v. Cameron Community Hospital, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000