Legal Opinion

Cox v. Miller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1975No. 9885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

Prompted by defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court opined plaintiff had not maintained a careful and vigilant lookout and was, therefore, guilty of negligence as a matter of law which contributed to cause the two-car-intersectional accident in question. Judgment was entered accordingly and plaintiff has appealed contending the question of his negligence vel non should have been submitted to the jury for decision.

North-south Main Street in Joplin consists of four traffic lanes (each 12 feet wide) and two curb-adjacent parking…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dill v. Poindexter Tile CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Shelton v. BrunerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Zumault v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. Anderson v. DyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Johnson v. BushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holtmeyer v. SchererMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Holloway v. Cameron Community Hospital, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API