Legal Opinion
Berry v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 20, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMMACK, Chief Justice.
This appeal concerns itself with the sufficiency of a notice sent to the City of Louisville pursuant to KRS 411.110. The trial court sustained the City’s special demurrer to appellant’s petition on the ground that the notice was insufficient.
KRS 411.110 is as follows:
“No action shall be maintained against any city in this state because of any injury growing out of any defect in the condition of any bridge, street, sidewalk, alley or other public thoroughfare, unless notice has been given to the mayor, city clerk or clerk of the board of aldermen in the manner provided…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spangler's Adm'r v. City of MiddlesboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Treitz v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Reibel v. WoolworthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Ballinger v. City of HarlanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roehrig v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- City of Dawson Springs v. ReddishCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961
- City of Louisville v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
- Baldridge v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
- Venstone Stone v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.