Legal Opinion

Barnier v. City of Kent

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 11, 1986No. 15667-5-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

Jerome and Joyce Barnier appeal a judgment dismissing without prejudice their action for declaratory relief. We reverse the dismissal and remand for entry of a declaratory judgment consistent with this opinion.

Jerome and Joyce Barnier own approximately 10 acres of unimproved land in the city of Kent. On June 19, 1978, the Kent City Council adopted an ordinance which created Local Improvement District 283 (LID 283) in an area of Kent which included the Barniers' property. LID 283 included sewer, water, storm drainage, lighting, and road improvements.

On July 19, 1978, the Barniers filed suit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Munden v. HazelriggWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Distilled Spirits Institute, Inc. v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sheng-Yen Lu v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Grandmaster Sheng-Yen Lu v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API