Legal Opinion

Sheng-Yen Lu v. King County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 28, 2002No. 47647-5-IPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

— The Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) generally provides the exclusive means of judicial review of final land use decisions.1 Here, Grandmaster Sheng-Yen Lu and others (the Neighbors) appeal dismissal of this declaratory judgment action. This action seeks an order directing King County to decide, prior to establishment of the final con*96figuration of mining activities, whether a conditional use permit (CUP) will be required for a proposed mining project. Because LUPA provides an adequate alternative remedy and this case is not ripe for judicial review, the trial court did not abuse its discretion…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Grandmaster Sheng-Yen Lu v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Quality Rock Products, Inc. v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Quality Rock Products, Inc. v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Davidson Serles & Associates v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Berst v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API