Legal Opinion
Young Again Products, Inc. v. Acord
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 11, 2004No. RWT 03-CV-2441PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TITUS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Young Again Products, Inc., brought suit against Defendants, John Acord (“Acord”) and Young Again Nutrients, 1 claiming trademark infringement in violation of the Lanham Act § 32, 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (count I), federal and common law unfair competition (counts II and III), copyright infringement in violation of the Copyright Act of 1976 (count V), breach of contract (count VI) and declaratory judgment (count VII) stemming from Defendants’ allegedly unauthorized use of various products that Young Again Products has trademarked and/or copyrighted.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- David T. Combs Sarah E. Combs v. James O. Bakker Tammy Faye Bakker Richard DortchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dynacorp Ltd. v. Aramtel Ltd.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. v. American Home Realty Network, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Young Again Products, Inc. v. John AcordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Rice v. Petedge, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Thousand Oaks Barrel Co. v. Deep South Barrels LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.